Designing a Credential: Claim, Criteria, Evidence and Metadata
Turn a learning or work activity into a credential that means something to a reader.
Why this course
A weak specification cannot be repaired later: platforms, marketing and wallets only carry what the specification says. This is the core practitioner course and the first Ability badge in two pathways.
What you will be able to do
- Write a credential claim and outcomes that state what the earner can do.
- Define criteria and the evidence that proves each of them.
- Complete the metadata needed for portability, including alignment, level and workload.
- Test a specification with a reader outside the issuing team and revise it.
Modules
- Start from the claim
- Outcomes and criteria
- Evidence that proves the claim
- Metadata for portability
- Naming and description
- Testing with readers
Assessment
Submit a complete credential specification for a real or realistic credential, assessed with the ICoBC design rubric; includes peer review.
Badge evidence: Credential specification; rubric result; peer review notes.
Prerequisites: ICB-F01
Who it is for
- Companies and employers
- Education and providers
- Associations and policy
Framework alignment
Credential design (CRDS, VRITE pillar Rigor)
Related skills: Assessment and evidence, Skills taxonomies and alignment. About the framework
Use in your organisation
In corporate training
Blended cohort module for L&D and corporate academy leads. Badge aligns to ICSF CRDS L2 (SFIA 3) and can be referenced in role profiles. Counts as skill evidence; competency on the job needs a V-series validation.
In education
Micro-credential of 10 h notional workload (about 0.4 ECTS), indicative EQF 4 to 5, assessed by assessed practical task with rubric. Stacks into pathway PW01, PW02.
EU micro-credential elements
| Awarding body | ICoBC e.V. or licensed issuer. Learning outcomes: see column. Notional workload: 10 h (about 0.4 ECTS). Level: ICSF L2, EQF 4 to 5 (indicative). Type of assessment: assessed practical task with rubric. Form of participation: Blended: online self-study and facilitated cohort sessions. Type of quality assurance: ICoBC internal QA against VRITE. Prerequisites: ICB-F01. |
|---|
Elements following the Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on a European approach to micro-credentials.
Part of these pathways
- Credential Programme Lead (corporate) step 4 of 9
- Micro-credential Designer (education) step 4 of 8
Quality and AI
Quality focus: VRITE Rigor (criteria and evidence) and Value (meaning to readers).
AI dimension: Optional AI drafting of descriptions with a required human edit log.
Improve this course
The course is open on GitHub in LiaScript format under CC BY 4.0. View the source or read how to suggest a change.